Who maintains this archive
Who publishes these verdicts, by what method, and what they gain from it — so you can decide how much credit to give what you read here.
Who
Trading Auditor is maintained by an independent trader and developer. There is no team, no investor, no sponsor, and no tie to any broker, research house, fund manager or course seller.
We are not a securities analyst registered with Brazil's CVM, and nothing here asks you to believe on authority. The archive publishes the record behind every verdict; the record's identifier is a hash of its own content, and the download sits on the card's page. Checking it does not depend on knowing who wrote it.
By what method
Every technique goes through the same 6 mandatory controls, in the same order, with the hypothesis written and dated before the number exists. No result enters the archive by any other route — including ours.
What gets published — including what fails
There are 956 records covering 325 distinct claims, measured between 2017 and 2026. Of those, 6 survived the controls.
Failures stay published, with the control that killed them and by how much. An archive that only shows what passed is not auditing anything — it is selecting. That is why the approval rate is low and in plain sight, not in a footnote.
What we get out of this
The public archive is free and carries no affiliate links, no broker commission, no advertising and no paid placement. No verdict changes sides for money, because no money is attached to any verdict.
The planned revenue is a subscription that audits your own technique against the same protocol — and it does not promise to approve it either. The product is the verdict, not the favourable verdict.
What this archive is not
It is not investment advice. APPROVED means the claim withstood the controls over the period and universe declared on the card. It is not a forecast, not advice, and not a promise of results.
It does not assess people. We audit the technique and what it claims, never the competence or honesty of whoever teaches it. That is a rule of conduct, and it holds even when the verdict is harsh.
It does not decide for you. The card hands you the method, the numbers and the record so you can redo the arithmetic. What you do with it is yours.
When we get it wrong
A method error is corrected and recorded publicly: the old card is not deleted, the new one is born beside it, and the history shows when the verdict changed. An archive where the auditor is never wrong is an archive where the prediction was written after the result was known.